[Song on YouTube] All the tabs I could find were crap, so I wrote up a guitar arrangement. The inverted voicings in the choruses made it tough to figure out, but capoing the 2nd fret gets it pretty close.
Capo 2nd fret. / = 1/4 note V1) A 3-5-5-4-3-x (2 bars) As logic stands you couldn't meet a man who's from the G#m 2-4-4-2-2-x (2 bars) future. A 3-5-5-4-3-x (2 bars) But logic broke as he appeared he spoke about the G#m 2-4-4-2-2-x (2 bars) future. B 5-7-7-6-5-x (1 bar) "We're not gonna A 3-5-5-4-3-x (1 bar) make it." B 5-7-7-6-5-x (1 bar) He explained how the A 3-5-5-4-3-x (1 bar) end will come. A 3-5-5-4-3-x (2 bars) You and me were never meant to be part of the G#m 2-4-4-2-2-x (1 bar) future. B x-0-7-6-5-x / / Bsus4add9 x-0-x-4-3-x / Bmaj7 x-0-6-6-5-x / C) Amaj7 3-2-0-0-0-2 (1 bar) All we Dmaj7/F# 0-3-2-0-0-0 (1 bar) have is C#m7/G# 2-2-4-2-3-2 (1 bar) now. F#7sus4 0-x-2-2-3-x / / F# 0-x-2-1-0-0 / / All we've ever had is now. All we have is now. Amaj7 3-2-0-0-0-2 (1 bar) All we've Dmaj7/F# 0-3-2-0-0-0 (1 bar) ever had i- G#m7 2-4-2-2-2-2 (2 bars) is now. B1) F#m7 0-2-2-0-3-x (1 bar) B7 x-0-2-0-2-0 (1 bar) V2) I noticed that he had a watch and hat that looked familiar. He was me from a dimension torn free of the future. "We're not gonna make it." He explained how the end will come. You and me were never meant to be part of the future. C) B2) F#m7 0-7-5-7-x-x (2 bars) Emaj9 x-5-4-6-5-x (2 bars) D9-5 8-x-8-7-7-x (2 bars) A 3-x-0-0-0-3 (2 bars) Bm6/F# 0-0-2-2-1-2 (1 bar) E7/G# 2-0-0-2-1-2 (1 bar) Outro) Amaj7 3-2-0-0-0-2 (1 bar) All we Dmaj7/F# 0-3-2-0-0-0 (1 bar) have is C#m7/G# 2-2-0-2-0-x (end) now. ... C#m9 x-2-0-2-2-x (organ adds D#) ... C#m11 x-2-0-2-2-0 (synth adds F#)
Further, if tax cuts don’t need to be paid for because they generate so much taxable economic activity that they pay for themselves, then neither do unemployment checks. After all, the two work very similarly: A tax cut puts more money in your pocket. Unemployment insurance puts more money in an unemployed person’s pocket. The difference is that the unemployed person is likelier to spend that money, which will generate more taxable economic activity than if that money is saved. That’s why Mark Zandi, an adviser to John McCain’s presidential campaign, estimated (pdf) that a dollar spent extending the Bush tax cuts would generate .32 cents of taxable economic activity, while a dollar spent on unemployment benefits would generate $1.61 of taxable economic activity.
In other words, using the theory under which tax cuts pay for themselves, unemployment benefits are a lot likelier to pay for themselves. …
More reasons to extend them:
- Ending benefits doesn’t magically create jobs
- Among those who can’t find work, spending will drop to nothing, depressing local economies
- Walked away from mortgages and desperately-liquidated assets will destroy tremendous amounts of long term value for short-term needs.
From the right, Megan McArdle:
…in recessions, the length of time for which people need “temporary” assistance stretches out. That means that the government has to respond with temporary benefit extensions. These aren’t just good for the people who are unemployed; it’s also good for us. Unemployment assistance is one of the “automatic fiscal stabilizers” that all but the most hard-nosed conservative economists agree help smooth the business cycle in modern industrial countries. Indeed, it’s one of the most effective forms of stimulus we have.
… [Not extending benefits would be] terrible economic policy–suddenly cutting off the taps would have nasty knock-on effects on the economy. And while it’s a lot of money, it’s one of the few government programs that pretty much unequivocally improve the net welfare of the American people. If Bunning wants to hold up something, how about finding some useless defense appropriations to complain about?
Great article on the misunderstood scope of the “Model” in the Model-View-Controller architecture. The takehome: Models are commonly thought of as wrappers for database access/stored objects, but application state and business logic need to go in them, too. Otherwise you get bloated controller and/or views that clumsily try to take care of these concerns.
Earlier today I was building a multi-step wizard app—no DB storage—and found my controllers getting messy with session and state handling code. The solution was a Wizard class that encapsulated the steps through the forms and the maintenance/validation of the collected data, but until this article I might not have thought of it as a model.
Zend Framework kinda, sorta has a hack for making a wizard using “subforms” and what makes this an awkward construction is that a view helper is not the best place to maintain the state info that a wizard requires. A “Zend_Wizard” class would need to encapsulate several forms; requirements and behaviors for moving forward and backward through the forms; and methods to inc/dec the step state, fetching the active form injected with session data. Only a single controller would be needed with 2 next/back methods, rather than methods for each step.
In the Elgg plugin ecosystem, there’s very little guidance/emphasis on creating models, so writers rarely encapsulate business logic at all. Instead it becomes spread out amongst controllers and—worse—views. Since views can easily be overridden depending on the order of plugins in a list, business logic can easily be mangled by logic from another plugin. That said, the view system does allow mods to mix behaviors in ways that would be difficult were views to be tied more closely to individual plugin models; a few exemplary mods—that store state and validation in a model rather than the controller/views—might help positively influence the culture.
“Miss Modular” has an amazing bass line. It’s probably looped on record, but they play it live…and usually faster than the recording. I’m fairly sure it’s capoed at the 7th fret—that’s how I’ve typed it up here.
Stereolab "Miss Modular" Capo bass @ 7th fret. spaces/numbers/hyphens = 1/16th notes. / = 1/4 notes. Intro) / / / / / D 2--- A 4--- 4- E 4--- B 0------- 0---2----- 0------------------------------- Verse) / / / / / / / / D 2--- A 4--- 4- 4--- 4--- 2- E 4--- 5-2--- B 0------- 0h1h2----- 0------- 0--- / / / / / / / / D 2--- A 4--- 4-- 2- 4--- 4-- 2- E 5---2--- 4--- 4--- B 0------/ 2------- 2---
- Mute all the strings, but mostly the bottom 3.
- At the beginning of the 3rd measure, by fretting the A on the 2nd string, you can slide the end of the low B up to meet it.
- Chords are just Bm7 and C#m7 (the brass makes A and C#m9 chords)
The Misconception: You are a rational, logical being who sees the world as it really is.
The Truth: You are as deluded as the rest of us, but that’s OK, it keeps you sane.
You Are Not So Smart is a blog devoted to self delusion and irrational thinking.
And it’s great.
The latest post is about on Subjective Validation, “a fancy way of saying you are far more vulnerable to suggestion when the subject of the conversation is you.”
The tendency to believe vague statements designed to appeal to just about anyone is called the Forer Effect, and psychologists point to this phenomenon to explain why people fall for pseudoscience like biorhythms, iridology and phrenology or mysticism like astrology, numerology and tarot cards.
The last was on Confirmation Bias, which explains the success of political echo chambers and why racism and xenophobia will always be with us; humans are wired to ignore evidence outside their preconceived beliefs.
In the last few years I’ve been taking stabs at my own confirmation bias, seeking out the best arguments and evidence from those I might be inclined to disagree with. While there are a tremendous number of pundits making baseless assertions, especially on the radio and television—mastery of confirmation bias is a winning strategy—there are just as many great writers and thinkers across the political spectrum with worthwhile arguments.
Other great posts: